New York Times’ iPad app: Advertising done right

NYT app iconThere’s a lot to like in this week’s update to the New York Times’ iPad app. The new version has much more content than the previous “Editor’s Choice” app, the navigation is improved and the app feels much more polished. But it’s the handling and placement of the ads that really impresses me.

In-app advertising so far has been a mixed bag. Many apps rely on ad networks and phone-optimized ad units. Some have created custom ad units, including “sponsored by” messages on the app’s splash screen.

The Times appears to have taken a different approach: their ads make excellent use both of the iPad’s form factor and new user interface features in Apple’s iOS. Continue reading “New York Times’ iPad app: Advertising done right”

Twitter is not just for headlines

You have a lot of valuable content to offer and not all of it is editorial.

Newspaper reader studies have shown that people read newspapers and subscribe to home delivery for a variety of reasons, mostly having to do with the bundling of various bits of information (editorial and sales) into a single package. On our web sites, we make sure to give readers not only our editorial content, but also display ads, classified ads and deal information for cars, homes, jobs, etc.

Why don’t we do this on Twitter? Like the desktop web and on mobile, I believe that news organizations should approach Twitter as a distribution tool but should not ignore Twitter’s unique characteristics and culture. A good newspaper Twitter feed should, I believe, incorporate all aspects of the total package. The “Twitter Edition” should include breaking news, non-breaking headlines of note, calendar items, classified listings, promotions, and sponsorship messages.

What sort of sponsorship messages? I’d start with deals or coupons from local restaurants timed to mealtimes. At 11am each workday, send out a note about an advertiser’s lunch special. Help your advertisers promote overstock sales. Tweet a few garage sales or open houses. Think about the different parts of your print or online products and try to represent them on Twitter.

Of course, before you include paid commercial messages, you’ll need enough followers to be valuable to your clients. My estimate is that you’d need a few hundred local followers before you could find interested advertisers. Keep the rates affordable and base them on how many local followers you have.

A few things to keep in mind:

  • Set followers’ expectations early – make sure they know the feed will include commercial messages
  • Keep the editorial:advertising ratio balanced. Too many ads will likely cause you to shed followers.
  • Watch the tone. Twitter is a much more conversational medium than newspapers. Give your Twitter feed(s) a voice and some character – but don’t stray into caricatures. The traditional newspaper “voice of God” style just doesn’t work here.
  • Offer more specific – and commercial-free – Twitter feeds for breaking news feed, sports, courts, etc.

    Because you’re going to share the responsibility for Tweeting between editorial and sales, you’ll probably want a tool that supports multiple users with unique logins so you can protect the master password to your Twitter account. The two big ones right now are CoTweet and HootSuite. HootSuite has one standout feature that I like: the ability to auto-Tweet from an RSS feed, which you can achieve with Of course, putting Tweets on autopilot is not preferred but it will keep your breaking news updates flowing when nobody is available to Tweet them manually.

    Is there already a conventional wisdom about sponsor tweets in a news stream? What do you think about this?

    Oh yeah, don’t forget to use your own short URL service!

    Online advertising study

    Forrester says 57% of online advertisers are interested in advertising in RSS feeds and that the online ad market will hit $14.7b this year. Why is it that traditional publishers don’t seem to be able to grasp this? It seems as though a lot of them are so busy trying to protect their old-world, offline products (Dinosaur Blogs), that they can’t see new opportunities. Certainly this is the case with the music, tv, and film industries. This isn’t a new argument but these new figures really point out what traditional publishers are missing.